Kabaka’s Private life- Media -Headlines Are Meant to bury the bad headlines in the country
28 Jan 2012 33 Comments
in Buganda, Legal issues, media in Uganda
Folks,The apology to the Kabaka by the Newvision boss, Robert Kabushenga, was a good step but they should not have followed it with publication of another picture of a woman who they claim to be the mother of prince Richard Semakokilo. It sends out a bad message to the one you are apologising to. Newvision was once again giving the ‘two fingers’ to the Mengo administration. They should have learned from that ‘Kutesa-Kabaka- land tittle’ story some years ago.
Yes, Newvision might have made millions out of this story, probably more than shs.500 Mrs Barbara Patience Kirabo is demanding from them, but they should not have rubbed salt in the wounds again by publishing another picture they aren’t sure of. Now, what if Mengo embarasses them and produces a different picture of the mother of prince Ssemakokilo? Will they apologise again or what?

Barbara Patience Kirabo, the lady whose photograph appeared in the state-owned Newspaper - The New Vision and its sister publication vernacular daily Bukedde on Wednesday as the mother of the Kabaka’s new son, Prince Richard Ssemakookiro
Newspaper columnists have the right to express whatever opinion they want, but they do not have the right to disseminate inaccuracies, distortions or fabrications and present them as facts. The way Newvision wrote their apology was like as if they have got some beef to settle with Kabaka, and i think this is what is hurting some Baganda.
I had avoided commenting on Prince Richard Semakokilo’s story ever since it was broken on the Ugandans At Heart(UAH) forum because of the mistakes that have so far been committed by both Mengo and the state. The story reminds of the day my daughter asked me if I was ‘uncle dad’ not ‘dad.
The world is laughing at us not because we have a king who cheated on his wife and never lied about it but it’s because we have made a great deal about it yet we have a lot of problems in our country. Please let’s cut the Kabaka some slack.
Yes! Kabaka has fathered a kid out of the wedlock. So are many other rich, poor and famous Ugandans. What I’m trying to figure out is don’t we have other issues to handle in Kampala other than Kabaka’s private life?? There are ‘snake-filled’ hospitals and corrupt government officers running rampant within the State House and all we are talking about is whether what Kabaka did was Christian or not. We should not really give a damn about where a traditional leader sticks his pecker because it’s so likely that the majority of kings in Uganda have boinked someone other than their wife while in office. This has only become media-worthy since the people in power figured out that it could take their bad headlines out of the media for a while. The Kabaka’s mistress story or whatever one wants to call it, is meant to bury the bad headlines for a while but I don’t think it’s gonna work.
Speaking of the bible and polygamy, I think, in the Old Testament, God had no problem with polygamy; the Bible does not prohibit it, and some of God’s favourite and most-beloved kings had wives by the dozens or even hundreds! For instance, King Solomon is said to have had 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3). Also, King David is said to have had many wives and concubines (2 Samuel 5:13). In Exodus 21:10, a man can marry an infinite amount of women without any limits to how many he can marry.
With King Solomon, he loved many foreign women. For example, he married the daughter of Pharaoh, and Moabite, Ammonite, E’domite, Sido’nian, and Hittite women. So, Kabaka Mutebi can marry in any tribe outside Buganda if he fancy doing it. It’s indeed not very pragmatic to weaken the Kabakaship over something so trivial.
Marriages in Western culture are based on monogamy and high-pair-bonding and this is something some Africans have come to appreciate. As a result, compatibility, age difference and long-term attractiveness is a matter of consideration before people get married. But I think this is not something Kabaka Mutebi had in mind when he went for the mother of Prince Richard Semakokilo.
In other words, he went with the universal view that other things are more important than wealth, age and status, because he(Kabaka) has got all the means to marry a woman whom he does not need to hide away from the media especially after having a son with her. There are a lot of families with ‘status’ that would have been willing to offer their daughters( young or old) to the Kabaka for anything, but may be he is silently trying to redefine ‘statuses. Today’s warped view of “status” is entirely dependent on wealth but let’s face it, majority of the highest “status” men and women in Uganda are arguably criminals, and most of them are hypocrites. You bring them near you, they can destroy you. So, why would a leader who is arguably ‘enemies’ with the state wish to marry from such influential families in Uganda at the moment?
Historically, marriage was a business arrangement. The bride was a commodity, her dowry a deal sweetener. And the groom was likely to be an unwitting pawn in an economic alliance between two families. For example, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) married his daughter to his cousin, Ali, to cement the friendship between families. Then two of his caliphs, Othman and Omar offered their daughters to him to also cement their friendship with the prophet. There was no paperwork, no possibility of divorce, and more often than not- no romance. But there was work to be done: procreation, the rearing of children and the enforcement of a contract that allowed for the orderly transfer of wealth and the cycle of arranged matrimony to continue.
Similarly, the birth of Prince Semakokilo should be looked at in that spectrum and we put this issue to bed. Marriage as some Ugandans know it today didn’t exist 90 years ago. I think the Kabaka is trying to balance the seesaw here (as we used to call it in my little physics at Kibuli.S.S). He could have ”married” another woman but he did not do so presumably because he did not wish to upset the church; he could have got another lady from an influential family but he decided to tap into the working class (‘commoners’) to balance things up. Buganda needed another prince and he found a way to offer it. End of story!
Now, he needs to man up and take that extra step as a social and cultural revolutionary, and tell the world the mother of his newlyborn son. He has not done anything wrong in the eyes of the law. The moment he introduced the prince to the media, more questions were definitely going to be asked, and the most important of all questions is:’’ who is the mother to the prince?’ Let Mengo come out with it and shut up the people that are making a great deal out of it. It does not matter whether the mother is of higher status or not as long as the Kabaka did whatever he did for the right reasons.The truth is that Mengo made some mistakes in the way they handled this issue, but I don’t intend to discuss their mistakes in a public forum out of respect and love for my Kabaka.
Nze bwendaba
Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba
COMMONER



WB Kyijomanyi
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:00:29
Folks
That shows why Ugandan papers are mediocre. The people who run them are educated but the products they put out is something else.
I canot think of anything worse for a so caled credible paper than what the New Vision group did.
Why the rush to show the mother anyways? Listen, none will change what happened. It has already happened and even God the creator canot undo it.
Ms Kirabo should demand billions not 500m.
WBK
Frank Mujabi
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:01:59
The combination of greed, intellectual dishonesty and Buganda hating resulted in someone thinking that he deserves the ‘scoop’
edward pojim
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:03:47
First of all, that woman deserves an apology. Nothing more than that. There is no basis for monetary compensation here from what has been written so far. To prove libel requires more than just being humilated or painted in bad light in a publication. There has to be intent. In this case, it’s unlikely that the same “mediocre” journalists could come up with any intent to injure the name and reputation of this woman.
Secondly, for any monetary compensation to come into play, she needs to demonstrate that she has suffered loss of income – fired from her job, customers boycotting her business, etc – because of the publication. As for Abdul’s glee about the “intelligence failure” to land the scoop on the Little Prince, I’ve always argued here that what Museveni has in ISO, ESO, State House Intelligence and whatnot, does not pass the barest test for operational intelligence. They may be better suited for analysing than gathering intelligence.
So, because they are poor at intelligence gathering, they rely mostly on unreliable sources of raw information including here at UAH and Radio Katwe. And then take ownership of that unfiltered information and call it a day. Uganda is under-serviced by its intelligence agencies.
Pojim
edward pojim
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:04:37
It’s called innocent mistake. Unless she proves any monetary loss and intent to malign her, her libel case is as weak as cooked noodle.
Pojim
WB Kyijomanyi
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:06:41
It is true New vision group set out to profit from lies. What is the penalty for that?
According to the story, Ms Kirabo had a fiance who has now worked away? How can we cost that? Think of the great life and yes including great sex she would have enjoyed. It is all now lost due to New vision lies. Think of the quality of her children and their future. Gone. Now she is asingle mother/ What are the consequences?
Then the anguish and the innuendo that she is a loose woman?
Uganadns ppaers are truly garbage, soory editors in UAH. You suck period. Then you had the gust to whine that ugandans do not buy paper. Why should they spend their hard earned money on such garbage and lies? beter to go for malwa or sabulenya that pay for lies.
You now know what ails Ugandan papers. Quality. Erase that there is no quality even from the papers they use to publish them.
I said here that most of the so called journalists go to Wandegeya to eat pork and have sex and then lie to their lazy editors with lies.
WBK
WB Kyijomanyi
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:07:29
Who broke the story? Let me tell you atrue story that happened in Kenya. There used to be a very good Weekly magazine by the name of Weekly Review edited by Hillary Ngweno a Kenyan of Ugandan origin. It was one of the best until Nyayo and his sidekicks started using it to attack the Kikuyu. And let me add another truth, the Kikuyu mean business when they say no they mean no. So anyways the Weekly review started to manufacture stories about Mr Mwai Kibakii then VP. They wrote a lot of negative stories that were not even close. But had their intended effect on the VP slot.
The Kikuyu decided that enough was enough. They boycotted The Weekly review. No advertising business and no buying the paper off the street. Guess what happened? The Weekly Review folded. It was rather sad but understandable. In the meantime the Kikuyu had opened Magazines like Finance and even Economic review.
The demise of the Weekly review sent shivers within the Kenya newspaper business. But Ugandans are not like Kenyans. They support the very institutions that oppress and bellitle them. In other words they give them money to abuse them more!. It is time Ugandans learned a thing or two about the Kikuyu. And yes including being frugal.
The New Vision is only doing this because the Monitor is so weak to offer the a real competition. That is the tragedy facing Uganda.
This story I suspect was meant to remove Agaba’s from the front page and offer some relief to Musisi and her actions against innocent Ugandans.
WBK
Richard Mukasa
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:08:43
Abbey
Let me correct you Ssebo.
It is very wrong for you to compare Kabaka Mutebi with the Biblical criminals like King Solomons who accumulated his wealth through his brutal treatment of thousands of slaves whose skeletons are still evident in the Solomon’s mines which are located in Jordan’s arid valleys. Many of these slaves still have chains tied on their ankles . Solomon and other criminals in the Bible practised polygamy for the purposes of greed and not because their God allowed it although they made such claims.
In Buganda, we are polygamous because our traditions do allow polygamy. The Kabaka of Buganda doesn’t have to justify his practise of polygamy to anyone apart from his inner family.
The trouble with many of you guys is that you do not understand Kiganda culture. You assume that you do but you don’t., That is why you keep referring to the Bible even when you damn well know that Buganda and Kiganda cultures have nothing to do with the Bible or any other religious book.
mkiwanuka
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:11:05
Abbey,
This story is rubbish and should not even be debated. We all know that New Vision is wrong. We were previously informed that Lady Nasinkombi is currently24yrs old. Assuming that is true then that would imply that the new photo provided by new vision was taken in 1999 when she was 11 years old, then one wonders how an eleven year old would be wedding.
Just ignore this Kabushenga and move on.
Regards
Moses
WB Kyijomanyi
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:14:56
Abbey:
You are right, Mmengo should have made full disclosure and introduced the new born along with the mother. The whole thing would have been done with.. The NRM govt is full of people who have slept with many married women in Uganda. NRM is a govt that has perfected the art of cuckolding Ugandan men. Even Amin never went to the NRM levels. From the political to the ruling class it is the same. If you believe what is out there many have fathered children with several married women and even with girls who were just kids. And are we not told that such sexual predators could be Uganda’s next president? Has New Vision ever bothered to produce their mother;s picture?
I am told some of the fathered children have been hidden in far places like Vancouver Canada. The alleged child fathered by a senior NRM honcho,. The alleged mother is a sister of an NRM minister. If I get very mad I might even disclose them here in UAH. Sorry, it won’t happen.
So in hindsight, Mmengo should learn from this that releasing full information is the best way forward. It is called full discourse. You cannot go wrong with it.
The Media in Uganda-the media people will hate me even more- is like the ICC on Kenya. They relied on lies and now the govt is coming out with facts.
Where is Mmengo’s PR to take on the cuckolding chaps at the New Vision and Bukedde? Mmengo has the suport of manys enior lawyers in Uganda who should have been tasked with the job.
To hear it from New Vision and the govt of the day would make one believe that NRM is full of angels. No. It is a regime of fornicators who have perfected the art of cuckolding other Ugandan men.
WBK
andrew
Jan 28, 2012 @ 19:58:04
We have read about all different stories from the same news papers. Now we need to read about the new prince
Wamala
Jan 28, 2012 @ 20:11:49
Guys click the link below & get to know the real Kabushenga.
James
Jan 28, 2012 @ 22:43:30
Why is mengo quiet about the 2nd photo of the prince’s mother at her wedding to another man? This story still has legs. Let us hope the kabaka did the needful i.e HIV test, DNA test to prove the prince is indeed his.(Assuming the picture is true) At 24 and already on a 2nd marriage. This does not bode well.
Frank Mujabi
Jan 29, 2012 @ 02:59:03
This wedding was in 1999. IF this is Nansikombi and she is 24 years now, she would have been 11 years at her wedding.!!
The maths don’t add up.
okurut simon peter
Jan 29, 2012 @ 03:01:19
I once lived in Buganda. Some elders used to tell me that all women in Buganda belong to the Kabaka; other men are just caretakers, if he picked one, the caretaker (husband?) would just pick a drum, dance all night praiing Kabaka for favouring him and his friends would join in the celebration. I had several Baganda elderly friends, three of them Musa, Haruna and Kintu used to tell me stories as we play “Omweso.” I told them that in Teso, we would spear the intruder. We have songs composed to that effect eg, ” Arai edia, imori oni, konye aberu, mam aimor” ie. ” if it is food we can share, but a wife, no sharing!” So when Kabaka Mutebi toured Mpigi district, I was really surprised to see women, both married and unmarried preparing to welcome him with a hope that the king would pick on one of them, which would give honour to their husbands for those already married and fame to the parents of the unmarried. When Kabaka Mutebi failed to pick on any during the tour, he received so many curses, the visibly angry elders blamed his failures on the long stay abroad. They said that he was not acting like a real king, that kings pick women; some of the unhappy men had spent fortunes to prepare their wives for the occasion. I was dismayed by what I saw, but respeced it as it was culture. Kabaka Mutebi’s actions drew me closer to him, he acted well. At Kakindu trading centre, one rich young man donated 3 Friesian cows, the elders wanted him to prostrate as he hands the cows, but the king did not approve of it, again the elders grumbled.
In my view getting another wife to produce for him a heir is okay as long as it does not violate the Buganda kingdom’s culture and constitution; and as long as it does not violate the Uganda constitution and any international laws. Those blaming Mutebi should cite the laws he has breached.
One guy complained that as a 56 year old man, Mutebi was wrong to impregnate a 24 year old. I challenge the guy to cite the laws Mutebi broke. I think the guy who complained was Mulindwa; my question to him is: how old was his girl friend when she produced their first baby or better still when he impregnaed her? May be it was not Mulinwa, in whch case he can ignore this question, but if he is the one, then he should answer it to set the record straight.
Peter Simon
george okello
Jan 29, 2012 @ 03:02:32
My friend Simon Peter Okurut,
What you narrate here is truly shocking and totally unbecoming of any
King or ruler in this the 21st Century. I firmly believe in the
emancipation of women and I believe they should not and must not be
treated in this way. It is retrogade and humiliating, you can not call
it a culture at all. Where then is the dignity in a marriage? Where is
the value of that man in a marriage if his wife can be violated by the
Kabaka. He is obviously a cuckolded and humiliated man, I doubt
whether he can show his face in the crowd.
The Kabaka may not have broken any criminal laws of Uganda as you
state, but there is a posibility of rape or serious sexual assault
having been committed if it turns out this woman was coerced,
intimidated, confused and misled into a sexual relationship with the
Kabaka. There is also a possibility that she is of low intelligence
and was not capable of giving consent to a sexual act.
Secondly, in civil law, the Kabaka opens himself to legal suits of
adultery in divorce cases that his wife Sylvia and the husband of
this woman might wish to bring. Both of them may also claim punitive
and exemplary damages, running into millions, for humiliation and hurt
of feelings.
Thirdly, the Kabaka would definitely have broken canon law, because he
married Sylvia in the Church of Uganda and took his vows to be
faithful to her for better or for worse. He has obviously broken this
vows, and in canon law he would be excommunicated from the church
because there are aggravating circumstances, namely committing
adultery with and fathering a child with a married woman.
Lastly, there are a lot of international covenants that protect women
from rape, sexual expoitation, gender discrimination, oppression based
on gender. I can quote all these convenants for you if you want, but
the point I am making is that the Kabaka would most certainly be in
breach of many of these conventions, which in international law,
protect women from exploitation and oppression. You can not quote a
moribund and repugnant culture as a defense to actions that undermine
the great leap forward that humanity has achieved in the emancipation
of women
Many thanks,
George O. Pacu-Otto
edward pojim
Jan 29, 2012 @ 03:11:12
What is the circulation numbers for the New Vision and Bukedde newspapers in London? Where does a London court draw its jurisdiction over Ugandan newspapers?
Okello might also want to consider these factors in newspaper libel cases, as opposed to books and other publications of perpetual nature;
1) Opportunity to exonerate self: Ms. Kirabo has been given ample opportunity to exonerate herself from that infamous article. She was in most news outlets in Uganda today.
2) Opportunity or demand to retract: Ms. Kirabo has asked the newspapers to retract the disputed story. This is where I have said here that NV needs to retract and apologize to her. There’s a timeline to follow in demanding a retraction of a newspapers/magaxine article: it’s one week for a daily, 30 days for a monthly and 90 days for a quarterly news magazine.
Annual publications like School Yearbook have 45 days from the date of demand for correction or retraction to comply, or be slapped with libel suit.
3) Proximity and jurisdiction: Uganda newspapers are hardly sold outside of the country. However, the article could have been picked up by wire or syndicate services, or news aggregators like Yahoo News and Google News, or even unofficial news discussion groups like Facebook and UAH. In this case, the responsibility of re-publishing any contested article lies with the publisher of that source or forum. So, UAH can not refer libel actions threatened against it for Ms. Kirabo’s article back to New Vision. That responsibility likes with the forum Moderator, Abbey.
But most importantly here, there has been no case filed against either the New Vision or Bukedde newspapers.
DR.KIPENJI
Jan 29, 2012 @ 03:12:56
Mr Pojim:
You see where the wisdom of age comes in? Some of us kept telling you to stop meddling in what
does not concern you,yet you continued croaking around about your modernity and fighting for rights
of women.
Now when the person whose image your reckless statements about her wants to attach monetary value
as to the cost of your ignorance,you are here again croaking that she is being greedy.
Do you incidentally have any conscience in you?If you did have, you would know that character destroyed
is priceless.You have observed how my friend the vigilantee lawyer of the famed vigilantee justice has already offered to have the lady in question sue the government in the UK for a paltry $1million only?
How much do you think that translates to in Uganda Shs? And all this because of our own ignorance!
So,take a few lessons learnt from this experience and you will never rash to derogate anybody’s behaviour.
Kipenji
EDWARD POJIM
Jan 29, 2012 @ 06:01:42
The Ugandan situation is the typical Stockholm Syndrone; where after a long co-habitation, the victim sides with his tormentor!
Ugandan government has loomed large in the operations and management of the national press forever. The only time that we had a fairly free press was during the tenure of President Binaisa. But even during that period, it was because the government was too weakened by political competing forces to devote any meaningful attention to the direction of the press.
Today, all the newspapers pretty much exist at the mercy of the NRM regime. Advertisers are watchful of the angle the newspapers take. A mere appearance of anti-government slant, and the ad money is cut off. A phone call from NRM headquarters to an editor is enough to kill a story or to upgrade an article to front page.
At the moment, six journalists are in various stages of court proceedings, having been charged with all sorts of crimes, including treason! So, in a way, the independent-leaning journalists face the wrath of the intolerant regime, while the mediocre, cowardising journalists serve as the regime mouth-piece.
It’s little wonder, therefore, that we have the press we have today.
Pojim
EDWARD MULINDWA
Jan 29, 2012 @ 06:23:01
Abbey Ssemuwemba
When you take a stand as such, there are two complications you are going to find. If what Ssabassajja did is right then the entire Buganda culture is a scam. All customs that created the foundation of Buganda culture were built to respect sex love and relationship, in fact it is so amazing that our fore fathers that built these customs did so with the understanding that development and civilization will show up at a later age and those cultures must be built to fit into that civilization. For example, a daughter in law does not walk across a house yard of a Sezaala and if she ever does that the Buko comes in and every one dies shacking. Listen to that one, do you really have a scientific explanation to justify that stand medically? Then answer is no but they wanted to stop father in laws from seeing the legs of the daughters in law and dating them. You cannot touch Omuko for you will shake and die, why? For again it was to stop them from dating them. Without culture there is no Buganda. And that culture is instituted in Buganda under a leadership of Ssabassajja and the Kingdom, he is the leader of this very culture that we all have been grown in to love and respect, and it has brought us up very well thank you to a point that even when you reach in Canada the culture you were brought in still works thank you. And that culture teaches us to respect the women we marry but to date those of our age. And he has failed in both to end up becoming a disgrace to Buganda Kingdom, to his family and to his children.
Abbey next week schools start in Uganda. Ssabassajja’s children are going to walk into those schools for a new year. What do you think is going to be the discussion in SsangaLyambogo’s class? What about the rest of the children? And yes I know you are claiming that this is Kabaka’s private life and we need to move off it, but do you think the children are not going to be bullied this coming week? Do you think they are not listening to the news? Do you think they do not watch television? Or you think the students they study with will not bully them? What kind of week of Ssanga Lyambogo going to have? You as a parent would you push your kids through what these kids are going to go through? Or you think the schools will not say anything for this is Kabaka’s private life?
This is a shame to the entire Kingdom for this is 2012 not 1300 sir.Because the more you see it as stale the more it reveals out its self, apparently the family of the girl is talking and Mengo better wizen up and start listening for this story has nowhere to go but erratic. Mengo needs to realize that the time of intimidation and bullying is passed and all indications seem that they have not got that message yet as late as last Friday, yesterday.
Why is it so important for Mengo to hold the details of the mother? And I agree that New Vision needs to check up their stories, but what is the hold on the details of the mother by Mengo?
EM
On the 49th
EDWARD MULINDWA
Jan 29, 2012 @ 06:23:24
With all due respect Nabagereka knew about the behaviors of Ssabassajja, I mean by the time she married him the man was a kids planting machine what did she expect? To me I think there are a couple of points I will make
{1} I think that although she agreed to follow the culture of Buganda in Mengo which takes a woman as a property, I believe that she expected to change it from with in, I have no question that she loved Ssabassajja but she also failed to realize the pressure she will be put under by this all men institution. She is in a very abusive relationship but trapped by all pressure that she can manage to take. I stated few years ago that she was literary followed in London and pressured to return to Uganda when that was never her will, she has lived in a separate address and she would not even be allowed to make that public. I will be surprised if she is allowed to go through with this divorce procedure for one wonders if we have any King whose marriage has been nullified by a court of law. It will be interesting to watch.
{2} It is amazing to me how similar this institution looks like the one in UK, for the manner Nabagereka is being treated is the very same that Princess Dianna was treated, they both are products and expendable at any moment and time.
3} I have been very disappointed to see how we as Baganda have failed to raise the bar of women in our society, and one of the things that disappointed me a great deal in Nabagereka is her total failure to use her position and raise the bar of women in Buganda culture. Women have started to defend themselves by using acid and that is not a way to go. We need to be educated but we need to change our cultural stands to make women equal partners in life. The danger comes in when Nabagereka keeps quite about it and when activists like Reverend Nakwombe fails to say a blip when Ssabassajja treats Nabagereka in this manner. This would have been a very good starting point of debate at minimum for our children to grow up knowing better. When I see people pleading passionately on how Ssabassajja is right for he can screw up any one in 2011, it baffles me if the Kijyomanyi’s will ever complain if we get a King that decides to pluck the eyes of his Queen out. You see in Buganda culture, the most loved woman gets deformed by Kabaka so that no one takes her ever, so they pluck out her eyes and cut off her nose sometimes they cut off her lips too. The way this Kabaka has been defended I can see a woman deformed in this manner and yes WBK will laugh it off for it is culturally acceptable. Fellow Baganda if you have a wife misbehaving, whack her right today, culture allows you to do so.
Lastly
{4} I have gone on record attacking this Nabagereka for in as much as I never expected too much from her, but the fact that she came from United States, I expected her to move this kingdom to civility from within, but expected her to lift the lives of Baganda women as I expected her to preach on birth control and public health, I expected her to tap into the good will she had and to be able to move Buganda an inch at minimum. She disappointed me completely when she decided to join the all men club and use Mengo for her own personal gains and make a killing of money as every one has done. Will I miss her? No for all along she has demonstrated that it is about her and only herself so either way I care very less. But I must be very quick to state that Nabagereka brought a face to the Buganda Kingdom. She brought the person in the institution that has no face to a point that she was more respected than Ssabassajja him self. I loved the way she presented herself for she did really fit the position, I adored her grace and the respect she gave the institution which failed to respect her. Nabagereka brought a face to Buganda kingdom a face Princess Dianna brought to the Birmingham palace and entire UK Kingdom. If she leaves that position she will never be replaced unless Ssabassajja finds another Camilla Parker, but not a Princess Diana. One cannot wait but to see how this Kingdom moves with its leadership of men culture and ego. And to Ssabassajja, good luck to the role model you have put out there for our sons as you continue to create victims over victims for the culture allows you to abuse women and spread kids one in every mother.
I am glad that Nabagereka has reached a point of buckling for this nonsense has been kept under the wraps for way too long, for to talk about it has always meant you are anti Kingdom.
Bashir Hangi
Jan 29, 2012 @ 08:57:31
Brother Semuwemba, i don’t think the state here in Uganda is deliberately influencing media houses to run the Kabaka’s story so as to bury the bad headlines. Yes that is possible with state owned media houses but not all media houses here, besides it is possible that the New Vision run the story purely on it’s merit but being state owned, people infer otherwise.
HRH the Kabaka is a leader, a public figure and therefore, his stories make news atleast. I did not see people complain when the media flashed photos of the razing Kasubi tombs or when the Kabaka was stopped from visiting his subjects in Kayunga. I agree with you the New Vision should not have published another photo of the prince’s mother after Kabushenga had offered an olive branch to the Mengo establishment. Publishing a second picture is a sign of desperacy on the side of the paper; they are fighting on hold onto their integrity which has been badly damaged by the picture.
There are many other issues to write about but even that of the Kabaka introducing his prince to the Kingdom through the media is worth giving space in the press. Corruption in state house and other government institutions is a talk of the country here my brother. All media houses have taken up this issue but it can not be a daily headline, if you have been following events here you will agree with me that corruption is the topic every where in Uganda.
Newspapers and other media are business entities driven by the desire to make revenue through sales. This necessitates that they come up with something new almost on a daily basis so they can not keep repeating the same stories unless there are new developments related to the stories they had previously covered. So in my opinion media houses are not covering the bad headlines for a moment.
I don’t quite well understand what the Kiganda culture say about the Kabaka having a child out of wedlock but i my friends tell me it’s normal but people have a right to comment on the matter given the status of HRH and as some one who is church wed. Apart from ordinary loyal subjects in Buganda, i believe kingdom officials and the HRH the Kabaka were ready for what is happening because they must have clearly foreseen all this before introducing the Prince to the subjects more so, through the media.
Wamala
Jan 29, 2012 @ 09:29:22
its absurd that we do share the same nation with guys like George Okello, Okurut Simon Peter & Edward Pojim. Okello you talk of rape or sexual assault having been committed by the Kabaka if it turns out this woman was coerced, intimidated, confused and misled into a sexual relationship with the Kabaka. Do you hear yourself Okello? even an uncivilized person can’t utter such arrogance. Where were you when your Brother / uncle was butchering, abducting & raping his own tribesmen, just kept hushed & now you are talking of rape by our mighty king. The same applies to your colleague Okurut. He talks of Buganda elders & goes to mention names like Musa, Haruna. No Muganda elder can ever identify him or herself by only a religious name. Never period. The likes of Okello, Pojim & Okurut just have a natural hatred for the Baganda as a people & they are now extending their hatred to our king. Are you aware that without Buganda Uganda wouldn’t have been what it is. Oh you would like to be reminded that Uganda comes from B(uganda).
FOR GOD AND MY COUNTRY
muhesi
Jan 29, 2012 @ 16:07:28
The same old rhetoric!! small minds (Wamala’s) discuss non issues, hiding behind old written scripts.
john Nsubuga
Jan 29, 2012 @ 17:00:35
Abbey,
Nooooo, this is not the right time to water down the seriousness of this debate. Let this debate continue, it is good for the country. If we love our kingdom that much, then we should also not shy away from debating the good things, but also entertain the not so good ones. The problem with some of my fellow Baganda is that, they only want to talk about good things, how can that be? is that kingdom holly? The people running it including the Kabaka, are also human beings, who are prone to making mistakes like every body else.
Outside of the bedroom, our Kabaka has very little private life if any. When I bear my children, I do not present them to the world/Uganda, he is under obligation to do so. As his subjects, it is our right to know. But doing so, also invites revealing who the mother is. Is there anybody, apart from my relatives, friends and associates who are bothered what kind of woman I bring home? No!…why, because I’m not spacial, Kabaka Muwenda Mutebi is a public figure.
This is the funny kakondo/high heel every Muganda is putting on at the moment, but do not know how to walk in them. Others want to criticise, but are afraid, many are laughing loudly, some are angry, and so on. Sadly, no one is telling us what is going on exactly, instead Mengo has left the job to speculators, and boy, are they having fun!!. Kabushenga is laughing all the way to the bank, as he introduces women after woman as the mothers of our potential future King. His news paper is selling like hot cake these days.
Taking a piss at the Kabaka, his kingdom and subjects, but who is to blame? The manner in which Sema was presented to his future subjects has caused a lot of bad whispering around town. Even amongst the most loyal subjects of the Kabaka, many are talking, an indication that there is something to chew on.
1/ You do not avert a public relations disaster by withholding this kind of information, it will be released by your enemies in a bad way. Why did Mengo wait this long to present the prince and mother to the people? But when they do, they only show us the prince but not the mother, why is that? If they were not ready, they should have sorted out those cultural issues first, then present both at the right moment.
2/ I’m by no means trying to embarrass Naginda, but Ugandan women tend to be prude by nature. Many of them out there are asking questions. Was it a mutual understanding between the couple before the king incited violence in the 24yr old’s Kasangati? did Naginda also find out late like every body else?
3/ As Christians who got married in church, what does it say of their integrity, moral reputation, ETC…if it was a mutual understanding? Is Mengo encouraging polygamy, open relationships, or what? As public front figures, what kind of messages are they sending out to their subjects if some begin to see them as not being exemplary? Please note that, I do understand the caltural obligations of the Kabaka to produce a heir, but could he have handled this matter a little better?
4/ We’ve had a lot about problems relating to generational sex, if true that the Kabaka slept with a 24yr old woman, hasn’t he reduced the entire kingdoms ability to educate young people about the dangers of these things to zero? Mengo cadres can no longer stand on solid ground to preach, because Baganda will simply question their moral authority. Such messages are already trickling through from some religious leaders.
For those who are good interpreters, there was a lot of encrypted messages in that second picture, considering that she was putting on a wedding dress. Kabushenga’s intentions are crystal clear, “to embarrass the Kabaka”. Of course he would argue that the Kabaka embarrassed him self, and should be responsible for his actions. I think he wants you to ponder the following:
a/ If true that this woman was indeed married, did the Kabaka snatch a married woman from her husband?
b/ If divorced, is it possible that he was responsible for the demise of that marriage?
c/ Are there children involved in the previous marriage? because that tilts the equilibrium even further.
Just food for thought!
JN . Munyoganda
Rogers Mataka
Jan 29, 2012 @ 18:44:25
Mr. Abbey Semuwemba
For those of you in the diaspora, please check out this site for your calls: http://www.umojaphone.com/.
It is a long time since I commented on these issues. I have just been reading your stuff. However, this one required some sort of comment.
Yes, there are many other issues that probably are more important to discuss than the private life of the Kabaka! However, having said that, the issue at hand is not really that the Kabaka like many other men, fathered a child out of wedlock. The relevance of the real issue to all the other ills that bedevil Uganda is the standards by which to judge our morality! I will give you a related example: here in Uganda, not many parents would be overly worried and frantic if they were lied to by their kids. They would only marginally worry if the kid was a habitual liar and if the consequences of the lie were more grave. In brief, we Ugandans or Africans have a greater tolerance for lying and liars than other parts of the world! As a student of history, I know that there was a time in Europe and Asia when you would have to fight a duel to death if you called someone a liar! For many ordinary people in Europe, calling someone a liar to his face can result in very grave consequences even now as we speak. What does this say? It simply says that the standards we apply when judging cases of lying are far below those applied by other non-African communities!
Now relate this propensity to tolerate lying or being called liars to our Transparency Index rating worldwide and you will get what I am talking about. Our tolerance of and indulgence in corrupt activities is directly related to our tolerance of lying or liars in our communities right from the family unit to the local community to the local government up to the highest level of our body politic.
In the same vein, our propensity to tolerate what the Kabaka did in spite of his church vows is a direct indication of what kind of society we are. It is worse when so-called anti-corruption crusaders (like some I read here on this forum) are ambivalent, equivocate and prevaricate on such an issue! When the Kabaka took solemn vows in a church wedding, he being above other men in Buganda, should not be the first to so publicly break them. His action is a blatant evidence that he was lying to the congregation and the Buganda nation that witnessed his wedding! If he did not intend to live by those vows, he should have been courageous enough to simply forego them! He should not have opted for a Christian wedding which has a Code of Conduct that explicitly stipulates that he should not be seen to have any other woman besides his wedded wife!
If the Kabaka can culturally take any woman and have his way with them, then HE should not have gone into this other culture whose code of conduct he could not live by! The Kabaka should take one Code of Ethics or Conduct and live by it or at least be seen by the public to live by it because of his symbolic and iconic significance to many people in Uganda! Any deviation from that code of conduct should not be applauded by anyone let alone the intelligentsia and Kingdom high ranks!
In Europe, one thing distinguished the majority of the Nobility from the Commoners: standing by their word! It was said that Noble only had his word! If he could not stand by his word, he was useless as a Noble! Lying directly contradicted this principle.
In conclusion therefore, this issue bears a direct relationship to all the other ills that Uganda is grappling with right now. The BASE of most of these ills is simple unadulterated LYING and our tolerance of liars! Corruption is directly descended from lying! Incompetence is also directly related to lying because you would have to lie that you are competent in order to be assigned a task that you, ultimately cannot perform to excellence! Child sacrifice is related to lying because the adherents of these religions are duped to think they will achieve great success without much effort by simply sacrificing someone’s kid! The BIBLE says that LYING is the mother of all SIN, just like MONEY is the root of all evil!
The Kabaka’s action is a direct case of LYING! Our acceptance of it, is a direct reflection of how corrupt our society is! I HIGHLY DOUBT IF THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD BE PROUD OF! What example are we giving to the generations coming after us? We shall not be able to achieve our objectives in any anti-corruption drive when we cannot be easily ashamed by a shameful act!
God Bless Uganda
RM
Kiberu
Jan 29, 2012 @ 18:49:27
OK Kabaka fathered a baby from a woman who is not the official Nabagereka, no big deal, his forefathers did just the same , remember the Kabaka himself was fathered from the 5th wife of his father Mutessa II, and that is an acceptable cultural practice in Buganda royal tradition. JUST LIKE YOWERI MUSEVENI our presidnt has fathered many children from other women other than his official wife, THE BAHIMA(M7′s tribe) cultural practice allows that, and even among them, one can easily father children from ánother Muhima’s wife as long as they are from the same clan.
The only requirement is that when you enter another man’s house to have sex with his woman , you must leave your spear at the door so that when the official husband comes he sees it and he has to wait somewhere or alternatively also go and look for some other woman whose husband is not home and do exactly a similar thing to the woman in this other household.JUST AS NO MUCH FUSS HAS BEEN PUT ON MUSEVENI’S OTHER CHILDREN WHOSE IDENTITY I KNOW OF, WHY SHOULD WE POUND THE KABAKA FOR THIS ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR IN HIS CULTURE???? what is good for the goose is good for the gander
john Nsubuga
Jan 29, 2012 @ 18:50:04
Mr. Kiberu,
I can not run away from my own culture, but equally, I think we should begin to examine certain bits with in our culture that need to be updated and do exactly that, in order to meet the challenges of our times. If Naginda could not bear us a boy to take over after King Mutebi, then we should do it in a manner that doesn’t dilute the reputation of the oldest kingdom south of the Sahara.
For instance, we could say that the girl must not have been married before, the age difference must not exceed or be below XYZ….and so on. Then the process of introducing the off-springs should also be handled correctly and so on. Mine is just a by-the-way kind of something, so do not declare a fatwa against me.
Bahima sleeping around with other men’s wives is an outdated practise, it is long dead and buried, save for a few ignorants doing what they know best. I do not see the dot.com, Ipod/Iphone/Ipad, generation accepting to indulge in such risky business. We had no HIV and AIDS in the olden days, but today, that action is suicidal.
Jaribu uwone ndugu!!
JN . Munyoganda
Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto
Jan 30, 2012 @ 18:04:39
Mr Mukasa,
While you pursue the tales from Radio Katwe, brought up by some of you with the hope of expunging the scandal we all know by now, do be aware of something I learnt in P.5.
You may have heard about Kabaka Sewanaku Kiggala Mukabya Kasungubu, the gentleman who reigned up to 1494 as the 5th Kabaka. After abdication, on accusation of being incestuous, he was succeeded by his 6th son Ntege Kiyimba who reigned up to 1484, followed by a 10 yr interregnum. Kiyimba was supposed to be succeeded by his brother (Kiggala’s 9th son), Wampamba. However, the latter was barred from being Kabaka because of of his incestuous ways that made him get involved with his aunt, Nakayima, the daughter of Gunju, Kiggala’s brother.
The product of that latter incest was Kayima Ssendikadiwa the 7th Kabaka from 1494, from whom even the present Kabakaship is traceable. That Kabaka was essentially his own father’s cousin. The rest of the Buganda Royal House for the last 518 years and 7 months is traceable to that piece of incest.
But let us leve the middle ages and we go to the more modern times. Look for a book of these details:
Hyam, Ronald (2007), Britain’s Declining Empire: The Road to Decolonisation, 1918-1968 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Check on Page 195 of that book and find that Governor Andrew Cohen was describing Kabaka Edward Mutesa II as a man who led an “impossible private life”. There is also reference to the opinion of Mr Lyttleton who noted that Kabaka Mutesa II was “a rascal of first order” who had practised “every perversity from incest with his sister to homosexuality and every indulgence from drinks to drugs”. Where did such claims originate from? Did the Cohens etc also have Radio Katwe?
Try also if you can and find a secret document…now declassified titled “The Personal character of the Kabaka of Buganda Mutesa II” (CO822/747). When you find it, let us discuss it privately. Strictly privately.
Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto
Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto
Jan 30, 2012 @ 18:05:10
Typo error: read 1464……
Point proved: Lysdexia is not a myth!
Lance Corporal (Rtd) Patrick Otto
katerega Musaazi
Jan 30, 2012 @ 18:07:52
l don’t think that there is any body injured with my first stories on the matter in both leading dailies(nEWVISION AND BUKEDDE).It was after l had made a deal with Katikkiro that we published the story in both leading English and Luganda Dailes and the Karikkiro also made a special announcement.
l don’t want to go in detail. But l think had Mmengo come out immediately with the name and identity of muzaana, there would not have been speculation as curiosity is natural and human.
l still remember when l was News Editor in 1999 and we were breaking
Nabageregeka’s story and mmengo ensured that we had a proper picture and we sat on a story for some days to enable it get us its own picture other than what we had got. Mmengo PR team needs reinforcement.
DR. EDDIE KAYONDO
Feb 02, 2012 @ 22:43:28
Every statement that comes from the Kingdom just pours more fuel to the fire. The mistake was made way before the picture of our Princess was leaked. This announcement should have been made as soon as he was born because in this generation which the younger ones know it’s very hard to keep such news a secret. After the effect there was no need of offering partial or incorrect information which implied that there was something to hide or a display of favoritism as to who will be the future King.
We respect our King, know the culture and ways of the Kings so total silence up to a well prepared grand introduction of the Price would then have been the right way to go. Short of that if the King had anything to say the first thing would have been asking for forgiveness from the Church where he got married for that’s the public promise he broke.
Now threatening the people is taking it to another level, that worked in the past when the people depended on the King and I explained this before. It recreates a reign of fear within the kingdom it makes the Kingdom the untouchables.
But one has to ask a very simple question, who is Buganda?
Buganda is not the King or the Lukiko and its Katikiro neither is it the 9,000 sq acres of land or the Kasubi tombs. Kings die, so does the katikiro and they are all replaceable. Buganda is its people. That’s why the definition of a Muganda is very crucial and the numbers are very crucial too.
Pride makes the people stick together and stand as one, give them something to be proud of because in this generation thats all Buganda can offer. There is no more land to give, or anything else substantial. So the Kingdom should do all it can to keep its people happy not just threatening them because the royalty that the past Kings enjoyed is currently only skin deep or worse still easily dissolved by monies.
We love our King, we love our Queen and all the royals, be what you are, royals and we will equally respect you, threats are things of the past, may be Buganda needs a Facebook generational Katikiro now.
Eddie, M.D
Monsieur Edward Mulindwa
Feb 04, 2012 @ 21:13:01
People
http://youtu.be/r90BXqcQl_g
I had to get a time to go after this fella called Kobushenga. Up to this day Saturday the 4th, I have failed to figure out why he decided to take the camera and apologize to Mengo. And honestly if you know why he apologized I am all yours today. What exactly was wrong done by New Vision to report about the birth of Prince Richard Ssemakokiro? New Vision’s job is to report news and the birth of a Prince is news in every single Conner of the world, Uganda can never be isolated. Now when New Vision posted the photograph it happened to be a wrong photograph, and I understand that, but does that push a national paper and though its highest office to stand up and take a camera to apologize?
There are two issues we need to look at here. New Vision failed the ball by failing to report the happenings of Mengo. The tax payer and a Muganda under this Kingdom has every right to know if Ssabassajja has a Muzaana that is pregnant, and not only pregnant but if he dates her. That is news, so the Katikiro’s “Ssabassajja’s bed life is secret” is a pile, as I have stated in another posting. But Mengo also lost the ball for some reason to think that a Muzaana can be dated get pregnant and have a baby when it is a secret. All these matters were in control of Mengo to manage fairly and Mengo simply dropped the ball due reasons best known by themselves. Mengo also dropped the ball when it moved at a speed of a rocket to issue a statement after the photograph showed up in UAH, by the way Mengo did not even recognize UAH as a source of the leak.
As soon as that leak showed up, all eyes turned to Mengo to see how they go after it, I mean I expected a statement which I got but it was short of details. As my mother always said that I had a guilty look at my face, Mengo’s handling of the issue showed that there was something very wrong about this story. We have seven months and no one has talked about it? Geez was Mengo still waiting for DNA results? One asked !!!! So everybody kept quite to listen to what Mengo has to say. And Walla Robert Kobushenga dropped the bomb of I am sorry. By that apology, Mengo stopped to be story and New Vision became the story, actually Robert himself became the story. To a point that even Mengo that was fumbling with statements started to come out bold and beautiful with a statement of threats. They decided to very rightly turn Kobushenga into a punch bag, for now he is the wrong man. Mengo threatened that it can stop to even give news reports to reporters, well you have not been giving them if you have a Muzaana that has a seven months prince. And what will New Vision actually lose if you don’t? And when Kobushenga stated “tetwagala kukola Ssabassajja bubi bwonna” Katikiro ramped it to “Embeera eno ekozesebbwa abantu abamu naddala abatayagaliza Buganda ne Kabaka mirembe okwogera ebyakalebule nga mwemuli okutyoboola Namulondo, okugingaginga ebifaananyi n’okwogera ebigambo ebitayisibwa mu kamwa ebikwaata ku Kabaka okukisa omukono “ And that happens for now Kobushenga is indirectly drafting the messages coming from Mengo, and that is what you get as soon as you create an apology.
Because of this apology, New Vision today needs Mengo than Mengo needs New Vision, and you never want to put a paper into that position. For what is the worst that would happen? Worst scenario was the wrong photograph, how was New Vision supposed to prove it is true? Did you want reporters to get a DNA sample from the Prince and cross test it? Mengo has started by refusing to talk, even if I was in Kobushenga’s shoes I would get the photograph from a source I think is right and post it for Mengo has failed to grow up. And if it is a wrong photograph, I post a line in next day paper that the photograph was wrong but we are working on getting a new one and we move on. The onus of posting a right photograph has never been of new Vision it is Katikiro’s job. But when you turn around and apologize now it is job Kobushenga to find aright photograph and post it. New Vision has driven us to a point where we will not know what is happening inside Mengo for it decided to become the story.
Robert Kobushenga never say sorry, it is a sign of weakness.
EM
On the 49th